Post your Warrior Burning Crusade specs here!

[Sol]

sol's spec

[Cinter]

Cinter's Spec

[Sol]

Woah, nice spec. I would love that spec. Impale + enrage and flurry... zang.

hmm, maybe i will try that spec out for leveling purposes... :)

[Cinter]

Moving TM really makes me mad and gimps the 17/34/0 style I am in now. :( TM should just be freaking trainable anyway. Stupid blizz, oh evocation and arcane explosion are necessities to the mage class, lets let them buy them. Oh, TM is necessary to be competent as a warrior in almost all instance, lets move it to prot. :12:

[Renia]

Moving TM really makes me mad and gimps the 17/34/0 style I am in now. :( TM should just be freaking trainable anyway. Stupid blizz, oh evocation and arcane explosion are necessities to the mage class, lets let them buy them. Oh, TM is necessary to be competent as a warrior in almost all instance, lets move it to prot. :12:

boo. hoo.

rogues have always had to spec in all 3 trees to be competent, so shush.

[Cinter]

Did they give you the solution as moving it to a completely irrelevant tree?

[Renia]

Did they give you the solution as moving it to a completely irrelevant tree?

everyone agrees that improved backstab should be in assassination and imp. SnD should be in combat..it both makes RP sense, and play sense. so, no, they didn't change it. it's just always been like that.

[Cinter]

Fair enough, lets stop taking the Warrior spec thread space though.

[Grurr]

My BC warrior spec is like this.

Find warrior.
Shoot warrior.
Pillage warrior's corpse, slaughter warrior's cattle, take warrior's women, enslave warrior's children.

Listen to the beautiful musical sound of "Boooo hooo... Hunters are overpowered. Sniffle."

:D

[wooti]

http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/...33021123531351


If i get to 70 :P.